You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, I would like to congratulate you on the development of this package. It is very user-friendly and has a lot of important functions.
I have a question about the threshold of the intensity.
Due to filtering the intensity of the the tumour marker has a zero-inflated distribution. This leads to problems, as the predict_phenoptype function sets the threshold at 0, making all cells positive for the tumor marker. How can I solve this problem? I would like to find a way to automatically set the threshold the right way, because we need to analyse hundreds of samples, so I would like to avoid setting the threshold manually for each sample.
I copied a few figures and code to explain what's happening:
Distribution of a marker, where threshold setting is ok:
Dear Yuzhou Feng and team members,
First of all, I would like to congratulate you on the development of this package. It is very user-friendly and has a lot of important functions.
I have a question about the threshold of the intensity.
Due to filtering the intensity of the the tumour marker has a zero-inflated distribution. This leads to problems, as the predict_phenoptype function sets the threshold at 0, making all cells positive for the tumor marker. How can I solve this problem? I would like to find a way to automatically set the threshold the right way, because we need to analyse hundreds of samples, so I would like to avoid setting the threshold manually for each sample.
I copied a few figures and code to explain what's happening:
Distribution of a marker, where threshold setting is ok:
Distribution of the tumor marker:
Amount of zero’s in the tumor marker variable:
Distribution of non-zero values:
Predict phenotype function to set the thresholds:
Unique phenotypes, due to incorrect threshold of the tumor marker:
Could you please advise me how to solve this issue in a way, that it is easy applicable to a large amount of samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: