Support for Dropwizard 3.x

[BastienDurel]

Hello.

It would be nice if Dropwizard 3.x could be added. Only a few import/interface renames are needed. (dropwizard-websocket-jee7-bundle cannot be used as jetty version changed (and some base DW classes changed package))

I've done that on https://github.com/BastienDurel/dropwizard-websocket-jsr356-bundle/tree/dropwizard_3 (with only a version chnge, don't know if a new artifact name would be better)

[TomCools]

I could introduce a new 3.x branch for that to work! However; I'd like to motivate people to jump on the newer 4.x.
If this 3.x is requested by a few more people (by commenting here), then I'll do it. 👍

[YSavitski]

Hi @TomCools
Will be latest release 4.x available and accessible on the maven-central?
I may see that 2.1.6 is the last avaialble version

Thx in advacne

[TomCools]

Hi @TomCools Will be latest release 4.x available and accessible on the maven-central? I may see that 2.1.6 is the last avaialble version

Thx in advacne

I forgot to update the badge in the readme it seems. The 4.x release has been on Maven Central for a while, https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/be.tomcools/dropwizard-websocket-jsr356-bundle. Note the change in artifact name.

[YSavitski]

Hi @TomCools Will be latest release 4.x available and accessible on the maven-central? I may see that 2.1.6 is the last avaialble version
Thx in advacne

I forgot to update the badge in the readme it seems. The 4.x release has been on Maven Central for a while, https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/be.tomcools/dropwizard-websocket-jsr356-bundle. Note the change in artifact name.

Hi @TomCools
Thank you for hint with link !

[spags-lacework]

This would be awesome to have to make upgrading Dropwizard easier, as I could stage it from 2->3, then 3->4. In someways it would be better to go just from 2->4, but I'm trying simplify the number of libraries to upgrade.

[YSavitski]

Hey @TomCools
I'm fully with @spags-lacework . It would be great to have support of intermediate version 3.x.
We're going to upgrade our projects and may see that doing upgrade from 2.1.x to 4.x within the one step is too complex and might be dangerous

[YSavitski]

Hey @TomCools would it be possible to review my changes #19 ?
Many thanks in advance