Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Report: Copper Cable Energy Loss Discrepancy in IndustrialCraft 2 Classic #1195

Open
SigmaFlame opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@SigmaFlame
Copy link

Hello,

Minecraft Version: 1.19.2
IndustrialCraft 2 Classic Version: 2.1.1

Description of the Issue:

There seems to be an inconsistency between the in-game wiki and the actual behavior of copper cables. According to the in-game wiki, copper cables should be able to support up to 5 blocks in length without any energy loss. However, based on my tests, energy loss occurs when the length exceeds 4 blocks. For a transfer of 40,000 EU, only 38,750 EU is successfully transmitted over a distance of 5 blocks.

I also conducted a test with gold cables, which the in-game wiki states can support 2 blocks in length without energy loss. In this case, I observed no energy loss over a 2-block distance, which aligns with the wiki's information.

Steps to Reproduce:

Set up a power source generating 40,000 EU.
Connect the source to a destination using 5 copper cables.
Observe the energy received at the destination (38,750 EU instead of 40,000 EU).
Expected Result:
Copper cables should transmit energy up to 5 blocks without any loss, as indicated in the in-game wiki.

Actual Result:
Energy loss is observed when using copper cables for a distance of more than 4 blocks.

Additional Notes:
This issue does not occur with gold cables when used for a distance of 2 blocks, consistent with the in-game wiki.

Thank you for looking into this!

@Speiger
Copy link
Member

Speiger commented Sep 6, 2024

This is mainly a wiki issue.
The loss is exactly 0.2... So technically you can go up to 5 blocks before you lose anything.
4 Blocks + machine.

But yeah this is something we just need to adjust in the wiki...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants