Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2502-3: Iron saturation [Mass Fraction] in Serum or Plasma #55

Open
callahantiff opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

2502-3: Iron saturation [Mass Fraction] in Serum or Plasma #55

callahantiff opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@callahantiff
Copy link
Collaborator

This LOINC term is annotated to HP:0040303 (Decreased serum iron). The test is measuring iron saturation, which is different than than a test which measures serum iron (e.g. LOINC 2498-4).

I may be interpreting this incorrectly, but serum iron and iron saturation appear to be two separate types of tests, although they are both used for making certain diagnoses. If you agree, I think a concept related to transferrin saturation may be more fitting?

@kingmanzhang
Copy link
Contributor

I think the biology is different but the annotation is probably fine. Iron is transported by transferrin, so low saturation roughly means low serum iron (?).

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2087960-overview

@callahantiff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think my initial question was not worded clearly, sorry about that.

What I meant to ask was why increased and decreased iron saturation (2502-3) lab results were being annotated to HPO terms that measured iron serum? I am asking this because there are HPO terms (HP:0012464 and HP:0012463) that measure increased and decreased iron or transferrin saturation?

Annotating this LOINC lab to the saturation HPO terms rather than the serum HPO terms seems like a more accurate mapping. Or was there a specific reason why you did not annotate it to those terms?

@kingmanzhang
Copy link
Contributor

In this case, annotating to your suggest HPO terms sounds more precise. I will relay this to @LCCarmody to see if she agrees. It is possible that your suggested classes are new.

@callahantiff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks Aaron, that sounds great. I'm wondering if I should add the dates that HPO terms were added when posting issues, but only if that would be helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants