You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now (as of PR #58), post_table() cannot do cross-group posting - that is specifically because the OriginalFile created for the file annotation that contains the table seems to always be created on the original group for the conn object, ignoring the conn.SERVICE_OPTS.setOmeroGroup() from set_group() and leading to a group mismatch between FileAnnotation and OriginalFile.
Describe the solution you'd like
Just make it work!
Describe alternatives you've considered
One alternative is trying a different solution for switching groups such as conn.setGroupForSession() and see if it makes any difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now (as of PR #58),
post_table()
cannot do cross-group posting - that is specifically because theOriginalFile
created for the file annotation that contains the table seems to always be created on the original group for theconn
object, ignoring theconn.SERVICE_OPTS.setOmeroGroup()
fromset_group()
and leading to a group mismatch betweenFileAnnotation
andOriginalFile
.Describe the solution you'd like
Just make it work!
Describe alternatives you've considered
One alternative is trying a different solution for switching groups such as
conn.setGroupForSession()
and see if it makes any difference.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: