-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The issue of abnormal indicators. #10
Comments
Hey @tayton42 - I just did a fresh install of the repository, and ran out (vlm-evaluation) ubuntu@ip-10-232-15-253:/mnt/fsx/skaramcheti/code/vlm-evaluation-dev$ accelerate launch --num_processes=8 scripts/evaluate.py --model_id="prism-dinosiglip+7b" --dataset.type="gqa-full"
...
The attention mask and the pad token id were not set. As a consequence, you may observe unexpected behavior. Please pass your input's `attention_mask` to obtain reliable results.
Setting `pad_token_id` to `eos_token_id`:2 for open-end generation.
04/30 [11:43:21] INFO | >> |=> Done Evaluating =>> Exiting!
(vlm-evaluation) ubuntu@ip-10-232-15-253:/mnt/fsx/skaramcheti/code/vlm-evaluation-dev$ python scripts/score.py
04/30 [11:44:44] INFO | >> [*] Starting Official Scoring for Dataset `gqa-full` => Model `prism-dinosiglip+7b`
INFO | >> [*] Results for Model `prism-dinosiglip+7b` on gqa-full (Split = testdev_balanced)
=> Accuracy (Official): 65.290 There might be a couple of gotchas here with dependency versions and |
Thank you for your reply.Here is the result of my
|
Thank you for your work! But I encountered some problems when calculating indicators using the code. Even when using the pretrain you provided, I got different results from those in the paper. I tested using the code from https://huggingface.co/TRI-ML/prismatic-vlms/tree/main/prism-dinosiglip%2B7b and got the following results.
I can't figure out which part of the problem is. Can you provide me with some suggestions? Thank you. Here is the script I used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: