Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inverse relationships #4

Open
hlafuente opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Inverse relationships #4

hlafuente opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@hlafuente
Copy link

Good Morning,

We are using the OCDS ontology in a project with city hall in Spain. We would need to know if there is the possibility of including some inverse relationships on the current ontology.

The relationships we would need are:

  • A relationship that links from ocds:ContractingProcess to ocds:Organization
  • A relationship that links from ocds:Tender to ocds:ContractingProcess
  • A relationship that links from ocds:Lot to ocds:Award
  • A relationship that links from ocds:Item to ocds:Tender

Regards, and thank you very much.

@ocorcho
Copy link
Contributor

ocorcho commented Nov 25, 2019

The following inverse relationships have been created:

  • involvesOrganisation (from Organisation to ContractingProcess) as inverse of playsRoleIn
  • hasBuyer (from Organisation to ContractingProcess) as inverse of isBuyerFor
  • isTenderOf from Tender to ContractingProcess, as inverse of hasTender
  • isProcuredInTender from Item to Tender, as inverse of hasItemToBeProcured

We need to know why you need inverse properties to relate Lot to Award (instead of doing it through the contracting process)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants