Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does RA-3301 Really Contain a PAINs Motif? #6

Open
mattodd opened this issue Sep 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Does RA-3301 Really Contain a PAINs Motif? #6

mattodd opened this issue Sep 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@mattodd
Copy link
Contributor

mattodd commented Sep 8, 2024

The "Mannich Phenol" motif that is potentially problematic in the 3301 series is mentioned in

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.7b00903

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 15 07 15

and

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/ra/c7ra06736d

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 15 07 47

Neither is an exact match. The flexibility of the motifs shown implies there is the possibility of a need for chelation if the motif is to be a problem. We don't have that, do we?

The second paper above does say that the PAIN effect disappears when the OH is methylated, and I see that that is a current synthetic target, which makes a lot of sense.

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 15 09 16

The papers don't provide a reason why the motif is an issue, but just show that they show up slightly more freqently than they ought, based on chance.

@mattodd mattodd added the question Further information is requested label Sep 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants