-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
type specimen of new nominotypical subspecies not displayed under Specimen records #208
Comments
Nominotypical names are the bane of our existence :( @proceps what does the SV fix do to TypeMaterial records, if anything? |
Has it been re-indexed? |
The holotype (from China, Nandinhe River) is still missing on the specimen tab of M. (M.) f. fallax. The specimen from Vietnam is not a type. |
I think, the problem is that the specimen are showed by their determination OTU, and not by type status. A specimen could be the type for 2 and more species names, but I could have only single current determination. |
I would recommend to put the determination as subspecies, in this case, you will see a dot on the map for both, species and subsspecies. |
I added a new subspecies to Mirollia (Mirollia) fallax and the soft validation fix created the nominotypical subspecies Mirollia (Mirollia) fallax fallax. Its holotype is missing on the Specimen records tab (regenerate DwC of the collection object doesn't help):
It is only displayed at the species:
The OTU of Mirollia (Mirollia) fallax fallax in TaxonWorks does show the holotype.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: