Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in Bridge anchor area #3413

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
qwewer0 opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Inconsistency in Bridge anchor area #3413

qwewer0 opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@qwewer0
Copy link

qwewer0 commented Jan 1, 2024

OrcaSlicer Version

1.9 Beta/Alpha, 1.8.1, 1.8

OS version

Windows 10

Additional system information

No response

Printer

Ender 3

How to reproduce

Updated info #3413 (comment)

  1. Open Slicer (1.9 Alpha/Beta, 1.8.1, 1.8 or pull request 3285 by igiannakas)
  2. Open the project file
  3. Turn off the Ensure vertical shell thickness setting
  4. Slice plate
  5. Go to layer 82
  6. See the bridge anchor area

The last version was 1.7 when it worked normally.

Actual results

The ends of the bridges are only anchored to the part with a single wall thickness.
image

Expected results

The ends of the bridges should be anchored to the part with the number of wall lops. (or at least with more than 1 wall thickness)
image

Project file & Debug log uploads

Cube Bridge.zip

Checklist of files to include

  • Log file
  • Project file
@qwewer0 qwewer0 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 1, 2024
@igiannakas
Copy link
Contributor

In my PR above have you tried with the new option enabled? Further reduce solid infill?

@qwewer0
Copy link
Author

qwewer0 commented Jan 1, 2024

In my PR above have you tried with the new option enabled? Further reduce solid infill?

Yes, but it's the same with or without.

@igiannakas
Copy link
Contributor

Reproduced; however this is not a bug - it's the legacy behaviour which is triggered when ensure vertical shell thickness is turned off. Not sure if this needs a fix or not- I printed a similar bridging test and the bridges were successful.

@qwewer0
Copy link
Author

qwewer0 commented Jan 2, 2024

Reproduced; however this is not a bug - it's the legacy behaviour which is triggered when ensure vertical shell thickness is turned off. Not sure if this needs a fix or not- I printed a similar bridging test and the bridges were successful.

My printer is in pieces right now, but I too will test it and close this if it works just fine.

@qwewer0
Copy link
Author

qwewer0 commented Jan 2, 2024

I did a few slicer tests - printer is still broken - and found something interesting:

I cut down the cube in the project file to only have a single layer at the bridging area. Cube Bridge - Cut.zip
Then checked with no top and 1 or 2 bottom layers, with Ensure vertical shell thickness still turned on.

As we can see below, a single bottom layer will cause the same problem with the bringing anchor area.
So, while having the Ensure vertical shell thickness turned off does change the default bridging behavior, it isn't the main cause of the problem.

Single bottom layer:
image

Two bottom layers:
image

@qwewer0 qwewer0 changed the title Ensure vertical shell thickness off issue with Bridge anchor area Issue with Bridge anchor area Jan 2, 2024
@qwewer0 qwewer0 changed the title Issue with Bridge anchor area Inconsistency in Bridge anchor area Jan 2, 2024
@qwewer0
Copy link
Author

qwewer0 commented Jan 7, 2024

Did a test print and it not only looks fine but it's strong too, so there is nothing to worry about.
IMG_20240107_142612

While I still think that this slicing inconsistency will need to be checked in the future, for now, it works just fine.

@igiannakas Thanks for the check-in, and for being awesome. 🌟
Keep it up, and have a great day.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants