Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
Great thoughts! I think this is one of the biggest issues preventing a streamlined workflow. I want to make a comprehensive post soon with my own thoughts. Profile inheritance is an absolute must have. Also we really need the ability to set profiles per-object. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@shayded-exe Managing profiles is painful at the moment. In order to delete a process profile that I created for something I have to actually select it and the edit it to be able to delete it. Crazy! I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For everyone else's reference, I've opened an issue regarding per-plate profiles #1309 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It gets even more confusing if you're synching profiles. Every time I delete a profile it reappears at a later time. I've tried turning off the sync, but then lose all of my existing custom profiles. I wish there were a way to see the synched profiles on the server side, so that I could manually remove the old profiles that I don't want to return. I'm fairly new to this, so it might be me doing something wrong to cause the issue. It's frustrating. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There must be simple checkbox to detach slicing profile form machine. It's EXTREMELY annoying to redo whole custom profile just because i changed to different printer. Also user should not be prevented from deleting all system profiles. I'd really like to use some new features and not wait until Merill port it to SuSi, but these two things are giant dealbreaker to me. I'm really baffled that these obligatory things were cut down. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Being able to layer multiple profiles to override specific settings of some base profile would be really neat. For example, I'd have my default 0.2 layer 2 wall profile, and merge settings from a strength profile (a trait or something like that) to set 3 walls and denser infill, as well as a surface finish profile for ironing and more consistent outer wall speeds. Even neater: being able to do some basic calculations in overriding trait profiles, like Right now, I have to maintain multiple duplicated profiles to implement this - updating all of them to change some default setting is quite cumbersome. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am not one of the 3D printing experts who know how everything works and how to accomplish anything in the slicer. I would say that only in the last couple months have I become an intermediate. That can be a benefit, because I still remember how hard some things were when I started and I answer those same questions for others every day in the forums.
The huge number of settings, different kinds of profiles, and especially how they all relate and interact is a very complex situation. BBL changed the name of one profile type from print to process. That did not really help. They added an interface that is improved in some ways and worse in others from what they started with from Prusa.
The initial confusion for users is that they do not understand the different types of profiles, the relationships and dependencies among them, how settings interact, and what they should and should not try. A large part of why a new way of managing, and interacting with profiles would be useful is to help make this visible and understandable to the user.
Next the UI makes the usage of profiles and settings even more confusing by not presenting the information and controls in a consistent manner. This causes mental confusion. The user is both trying to understand conceptually, and trying to "make it work" at the same time.
In order to highlight some of that interface inconsistency I am just going to provide some bullet points. Later I might discuss some of the specific issues.
There are dozens of other things I could add. I just remembered that I often hear the question "how do I get rid of a profile?". Well, it just is not obvious to most users.
Now some comments, before everyone just dismisses this post without consideration.
I want to start a discussion and see what others think and share ideas to make it better.
I am not claiming that everything currently existing is bad or should be discarded.
I do think there are some areas that could be improved.
Let's ignore the comments that I made above for a moment and consider just something new and independent. What if there was a profile editor, not to replace how normal changes are made while slicing a model, but a way to "manage" all of the profiles. It could provide many functions that are not available, or have to be done in little pieces currently. It could be opened just like any of the other dialogs in Orca Slicer, but it could also be a separate application.
Some of the functions that I would like to see in such a tool:
That should be enough to get a discussion started.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions