Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Translate non recursive let to nontac expr when possible #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

SkySkimmer
Copy link
Owner

Fix #16 (by being compatible with Tac2intern.is_value)

I'd like to have a more direct implementation than using is_nontac but it's not coming to me.

Fix #16 (by being compatible with Tac2intern.is_value)

I'd like to have a more direct implementation than using `is_nontac`
but it's not coming to me.
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer merged commit 6ed98ce into main Dec 4, 2023
1 check passed
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer deleted the nontac-let branch December 4, 2023 15:08
@Janno Janno mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Assertion failed in force_nontac_expr
1 participant