Table subtypes

[gabays]

Should we offer: :row and column if people want to split the table? Or is it more a a CustomZone:row#1?

[Jean-Baptiste-Camps]

row are lines, I think.

[gabays]

Shall we add rowLine and suggest CustomZone:column?

[Jean-Baptiste-Camps]

Nope.

[Jean-Baptiste-Camps]

Well, I think lines are lines, so you do not need a specific type ? But we should have feedback from someone working on tables, such as @alix-tz or @Segolene-Albouy .

[alix-tz]

What about using "cell"?

[gabays]

We can also say RowLine is superfluous, because a line in a table is per se a row. Then I propose to mention this problem in our definitions of DefaultLine and TableZone to be clear. And mention CustomLine:column if needed (if I remember well, such zones were used by Lectaurep).

(source: ici)

[alix-tz]

It would be interesting to complement lectaurep's usecase with one where the document has drawn lines defining the rows. In Lectaurep, the only stable markers in the table were the column's, which is the reason why we have always focused on them. Maybe in another document, being able to point at the rows is more important than being able to point at the columns.

[Segolene-Albouy]

In our project, we use lines filled with cells (Shape) that are associated with custom attributes informing on their column and row number.