Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

analysis of most used neighbors #79

Open
CSchott opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

analysis of most used neighbors #79

CSchott opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@CSchott
Copy link
Contributor

CSchott commented May 18, 2016

create separate table neighborTags

  • key -> hastag
  • family -> neighbortag
  • value -> amount
    or
  • qualifyer -> amount
@CSchott CSchott self-assigned this May 18, 2016
@merando
Copy link
Contributor

merando commented May 26, 2016

@CSchott & @martingrimmer what is the status of this issue?

@merando
Copy link
Contributor

merando commented May 26, 2016

I'd like to suggest that we also add the hashtag without a neighbortag. This field would count the total occurences of the hashtag. We can use this for a propper visualization of the tag graph later on.
Any objections @CSchott or @martingrimmer ?

@CSchott
Copy link
Contributor Author

CSchott commented May 26, 2016

Currently i am getting the hastags by the entities: hastag attribute of the json from the rawtwitterdata table. Currently i am working on storing them again in the neighbourTags table.
So you would like to store the hastags without neighbour in the same table with empty family. Is this correct?

@martingrimmer
Copy link
Contributor

martingrimmer commented May 27, 2016

my suggestion:
key: hashtag
family: one of those values: "c" for count, "n" for neighbours
qualifier: if family == "c": neighbour hashtag (eg. "yolo"), otherwise: empty
value: count of the hashtag or the neighbour hashtag

@merando
Copy link
Contributor

merando commented May 27, 2016

I think thats the way to go. Good suggestion @martingrimmer .
@CSchott please implement this, if you have questions feel free to contact us

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants