Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[compute/cker] Remove the storage order parametrization from BatchMatMul #14371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

tomdol
Copy link
Contributor

@tomdol tomdol commented Nov 26, 2024

This commit removes the obsolete parametrization of the BatchMatMul x86 optimized kernel. The reason is that the storage order attribute of the MatrixParams class is later ignored by the x86 Gemm implementation using Eigen.

ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Tomasz Dolbniak [email protected]

This commit removes the obsolete parametrization of the BatchMatMul x86 optimized kernel. The reason is that the storage order attribute of the MatrixParams class is later ignored by the x86 Gemm implementation using Eigen.

ONE-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Tomasz Dolbniak [email protected]
@tomdol
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomdol commented Nov 26, 2024

@chunseoklee
Copy link
Contributor

@tomdol How about keeping this as it is since

  1. This layer is correct
  2. library other than eigen might use this layout

I suggest to add notes about notifying "this layout is not used in GemmImplUsingEigen".

@tomdol
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomdol commented Nov 27, 2024

Ok, makes sense. I've added the comments to the existing kernel instead.

Copy link
Contributor

@zetwhite zetwhite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chunseoklee chunseoklee merged commit 0d5f1c8 into Samsung:master Nov 28, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants