You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The old proposal was that we use representations to allow any given path to be accessed as both a cdmi-container and a cdmi-dataobject. "container/data duality"
Currently, we define that it is an error to access a data object where the path ends in "/" and it is an error to access a container where the path does not end in a "/". If we relaxed the first restriction, containers could also be accessed as data objects.
E.g. A container called "/foo/". If this is treated as a data object, it would initially be empty, but you could add data.
"/foo" and "/foo/" are two different objects.
We would need to evaluate the spec to see where there are assumptions or specific stipulations about about the meaning of "/" in an object name.
In some systems, containers can have values. We should defined a standardized way to manage this.
E.g. allowing Accept: application/cdmi-object in addition to application/cdmi-container
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: