You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to comment on the section where the next steps are motivated ("How such a comprehensive conceptual model should be expressed [...] is something that ought to be formally defined. This idea was suggested in multiple interviews.").
In the scope of Gaia-X, the Service Characteristics group (including @moosmannp, @clange, me, and others) proposed and effectively used YAML files as SSoT. They proved to be a promising tradeoff between UML (easy & visual, but weak in features) and RDF (mature & complete, but complex and unhandy). IMHO, it would make sense to include this in the future work of the blog article and at SEMIC.
Very good blog article in addition to the SEMIC Style Guide 1.0.0!
I would like to comment on the section where the next steps are motivated ("How such a comprehensive conceptual model should be expressed [...] is something that ought to be formally defined. This idea was suggested in multiple interviews.").
In the scope of Gaia-X, the Service Characteristics group (including @moosmannp, @clange, me, and others) proposed and effectively used YAML files as SSoT. They proved to be a promising tradeoff between UML (easy & visual, but weak in features) and RDF (mature & complete, but complex and unhandy). IMHO, it would make sense to include this in the future work of the blog article and at SEMIC.
Resources:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: