New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Blog Post: XML Mapping - Question 5: Extension mechanism #102

Open

PwC-Arthur opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

Blog-XMLMapping

PwC-Arthur commented Apr 17, 2024

In the context of the webinar on the review of the Core Vocabularies and the Style Guide blog post on XML Schema the following question was raised:

Is the approach of providing an extension mechanism for each defined type useful for the SEMIC community? [Link to slides] [Link to Blog post]
If yes, what kind of approach should be taken?

The feedback below was provided during the webinar:

In the case of Germany a restriction approach is used. The start is a big construction set and elements are deleted when they are not necessary.

The community members are encouraged to use this issue as a platform to provide additional feedback on this question.

PwC-Arthur added the Blog-XMLMapping label

PwC-Arthur changed the title ~~Blog Post: XML Mapping - Question 5:~~ Blog Post: XML Mapping - Question 5: Extension mechanism

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment