Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple Stage I Tests #545

Closed
balkce opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Simple Stage I Tests #545

balkce opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@balkce
Copy link
Contributor

balkce commented Feb 5, 2019

We are at a week from the deadline for the first draft of the rule book. I want to remind the TC and rule book authors that the intent of Stage I is to have simple tests that require a small amount of setup.

If I remember correctly (I may be wrong, please correct me if so), we are aiming to have 2 scenarios with at least 4 tests each to provide teams that can do a LOT of tests more points that those that repeat tests. Each scenario will be carried out at least twice, with at least 3 repetitions each. Considering that past years we've had 12 teams per league, that means that we will be carrying out around 36 tests for each scenario slot.

THE POINT: We need to have Stage I tests that are easy to set up and straight to the point.

I've read through some of the tests, and I believe that there are several that require simplification. Some examples: #520 , #528 , #529 . This is not an exhaustive list by any means.

I would ask the rule book authors to have a look #526 as an example. It has a simple description, specific objectives, straight to the point and very easy to setup.

@kyordhel
Copy link
Contributor

@balkce Can we consier this as complete? What do you think we have pending in out ToDo list?

@balkce
Copy link
Contributor Author

balkce commented Mar 14, 2019

This issue can be closed. I think most of the task are simple enough now. The ones that aren't are on their way there. Closing issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants