feedback: what do you think of the TreeDiff file format?

[monperrus]

Hi,

We're working a common file format for the output of tree differencing tools. The idea is that many tree differencing tools would have an option to output this format. This would:

• ease building tools on top of tree differencing
• ease scientific experiments to compare the effectiveness of each tool on specific use cases.

Here is a first draft of the TreeDiff file format: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15ITrZ4c0qdb4rGLfaMt8K9VPG1CkNp5QSgfOY6jzpEk/edit?usp=sharing (comments can be left in the Gdoc)

What do you think?

Best regards,

Jean-Rémy (@jrfaller), Matias (@martinezmatias) and Martin (@monperrus) (authors of Gumtree)

[ReinoutStevens]

Hey Martin,

Thanks for reaching out. I've left academia 1.5y ago and havent really followed MSR research. You can reach out to @cderoove who is still the head of my (ex) research group to get his input.

Kind regards,

Reinout

[cderoove]

Hi Martin, I’ve forwarded your request to Tim Molderez (@timmolderez), who is an expert on mining in distilled changes. We will get back to you via e-mail. Kind regards, Coen On 4 Dec 2018, at 22:27, Reinout Stevens <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hey Martin, Thanks for reaching out. I've left academia 1.5y ago and havent really followed MSR research. You can reach out to @cderoove<https://github.com/cderoove> who is still the head of my (ex) research group to get his input. Kind regards, Reinout — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#2 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA8QhDqzKuwsDe65zAjnq1GZ2tVQCmVZks5u1ujfgaJpZM4ZAPOl>.

[monperrus]

Thanks!