Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QC optimizer doesn't support a custom parameter matrix #8345

Open
3 tasks done
D1mi3 opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

QC optimizer doesn't support a custom parameter matrix #8345

D1mi3 opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@D1mi3
Copy link

D1mi3 commented Sep 27, 2024

Expected Behavior

The QC optimizer should be able to receive a custom 2D matrix of parameters and values such as:

{param_1: [1, 2, 5],
param_2: [10, 15, 35]}

Actual Behavior

The QC optimizer only supports a range of values for each parameter with a static step value, which means that consecutive values in each parameter vector must be equally distant one from another. This poses a problem since a lot of times the sensitive parameter values are found at irregular intervals, and trying every intermediate value in their range increases the optimization cost by a large margin. For example:

# 9 combinations
{param_1: [1, 2, 5],
param_2: [10, 15, 35]}

# vs 30 combinations
{param_1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], # step =1
param_2: [10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35]} # step = 5

Potential Solution

Implementing logic for handling a 2D parameter-value matrix.

Checklist

  • I have completely filled out this template
  • I have confirmed that this issue exists on the current master branch
  • I have confirmed that this is not a duplicate issue by searching issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants