Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New tutorials look bad online #388

Closed
nonhermitian opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

New tutorials look bad online #388

nonhermitian opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@nonhermitian
Copy link
Contributor

nonhermitian commented Jun 15, 2023

The new tutorials now have a ton of space due to inputs and outputs taking up new lines (#387). In addition, many of the figures are "squeezed" and look less than ideal. E.g from the QAOA tutorial:

Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 15 26 24

However, if I copy and paste the figure elsewhere (like this issue) then it appears fine.

image

@nonhermitian nonhermitian added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 15, 2023
@nonhermitian
Copy link
Contributor Author

This looks to be a theme issue because copying the file into the Sphinx build of https://quantum-enablement.org/ yields a correct looking file:

Screenshot 2023-06-15 at 18 49 03

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano transferred this issue from Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-runtime Jun 16, 2023
@Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @nonhermitian, we recently switched both Qiskit and Qiskit Algorithms to use the new theme built on top of Furo (pip docs). Can you please check out some tutorials at https://qiskit.org/documentation/tutorials.html and https://qiskit.org/ecosystem/algorithms/tutorials/index.html and let me know if you still have concerns? It looks like they're rendering better now.

Please reopen this issue if you find any problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants