Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTFS directory reads are twice as slow as FAT32 or exFAT #189

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 17, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?

if make a batch file that does 1000 loops of:

if exist /fred.txt echo fred > (md)0x300+1

On an NTFS formatted USB 2.0 flash drive it takes 40 seconds.
The same drive formatted as FAT32 takes 20 seconds.
The same drive formatted as exFAT takes 24 seconds.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

If enumerating files in large directories, why is NTFS so slow?
Can it be speeded up?


What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0.4.5c and 0.4.6a give similar results


Please provide any additional information below.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by Steve6375 on 28 Jul 2014 at 12:00

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

May be NTFS format is more complex, it takes more time to calculate.

I do not understand NTFS。

Original comment by chenall.cn on 3 Aug 2014 at 12:07

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant