Replies: 1 comment
-
You are correct. The algorithm is really meant for 3D images, and 2D is just for demonstrations. You can just used the inscribed diameter and compute the equivalent one yourself if needed to be more accurate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
When retrieving the pore equivalent diameter, does the algorithm take into consideration if the network was produced from a 2d or 3d image? In the following code
https://porespy-fork.readthedocs.io/en/latest/_modules/porespy/network_extraction/__getnet__.html
the line
net['pore.equivalent_diameter'] = 2*((3/4*net['pore.volume']/sp.pi)**(1/3))
implies that the diameter is computed assuming a sphere, not a disk. Is this always the case, regardless of image dimension (2d/3d)?
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions