The test case input (= open source software)
- constantly claims to be licensed under the MIT license, but the class file
envService.java
andenvServiceTest.java
are divergently licensed under the BSD-2-Clause - is licensing the file envService.java under a 'wrong', but well known and often used SPDX identifier BSD-2CL
- integrates the BSD-2-Clause license text into the file header
- delivers its default license text in a file named COPYING although this is normally only be done by GNU software
- the file COPYING contains the text of the MIT license but does not declare to be the MIT license
- uses the names "Karsten Reincke", "kreincke", "K.Reincke" but due to the fact, that only the MIT-Licence and the BSD-2CL-License may be integrated into the OSCF file, none of the respective copyright lines may appear.
- the tar/zip file created by the command
gradle build
contains the MIT license file, but not the BSD-License file - contains the gradle wrapper script, created by 'gradle wrapper' and the gradle-wrapper.jar both licensed under the Apache-v2 license (= LICENSE.gradle) => A tool which automatically generates the sufficient compliance artifacts must/should create
- the artifacts for the repository (= including the gradle artifacts)
- the artifacts for the tdosca-tc03b.jar file (= excluding the gradle artifacts)
- does not contain the gradle-NOTICE-file due to the fact, that the repository https://github.com/gradle/gradle itself does not contain such a file named NOTICE