Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sample select clause for ConditionId to use type definition of ConditionType #651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

Archie-Miller
Copy link
Contributor

…tion of ConditionType

Samples Issue 650

Proposed changes

The best practice for creating a select clause for ConditionId should be to use the TypeDefinition of ConditionType

Related Issues

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.

  • [ x ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Test enhancement (non-breaking change to increase test coverage)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected, requires version increase of Nuget packages)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • [ x ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc.
  • [ x ] I have signed the CLA.
  • I ran tests locally with my changes, all passed.
  • I fixed all failing tests in the CI pipelines.
  • I fixed all introduced issues with CodeQL and LGTM.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate).
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Further comments

No Changes have been made to the server at this point in time. More consultation with the spec part nine should happen before any changes are made to the reference server operations.

Copy link

@htbmw htbmw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix, it makes more logical sense now.

@romanett romanett merged commit b9e0ad2 into OPCFoundation:master Dec 10, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Alarms & Conditions example cannot retrieve the ConditionId event field on Siemens PLC
3 participants