Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IOP Workshop 2018: GDS Client issues #175

Open
mregen opened this issue Feb 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

IOP Workshop 2018: GDS Client issues #175

mregen opened this issue Feb 5, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@mregen
Copy link
Contributor

mregen commented Feb 5, 2018

The following bugs or unsupported use cases were found on the IOP workshop by GDS users:

  • Try to create a new certificate just with a .der file / no private key. (Use case should not be supported, require public/private key pair or force to create new public/private key pair)
  • Same as above, but try to create public/private key pair and private key is a .pem file. .pem is not saved. (Do not support use case)
  • server registration: allow to read info from real server, even when in server pull
  • %CommonApplicationData% is sometimes not replaced in public/private key field when saving certs. (Prevent use case?)
  • Private key password support for all use cases. (new public/private keypair, signing)
  • Create/sign cert when only a .pfx is available and required. (workaround: export .der, then sign etc.)
  • Create a new .pfx from information in .der (clone cert, create new private/public keypair)
  • Client Pull: Sometimes hostname of GDS server is added to cert list of domains
  • Saving domain names in database doesn't seem to work?
@mregen mregen self-assigned this Feb 5, 2018
@mregen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mregen commented May 5, 2018

Target timeframe to fix this is for the next workshop in fall'18

@mregen mregen removed their assignment Apr 12, 2019
@mregen mregen transferred this issue from OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard Aug 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant