Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feedback F20 (issue 8, CM): It is not clear why there is a mapping to non-awarded contract #369

Open
valexande opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Feedback F20 (issue 8, CM): It is not clear why there is a mapping to non-awarded contract #369

valexande opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@csnyulas @valexande
Labels
type: missing feature something expected but missing from a release
Milestone
2023-05-future

Comments

@valexande
Copy link
Collaborator

valexande commented May 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Section V: It is not clear why there is a mapping to non-awarded contract when this is about a contract the only mapping to the lot should possibly the lot number which seems to be missing.

There is no indication of how the ContractModificationNotice is related to the Contract in the conceptual model.
@csnyulas csnyulas added this to the 2023-05 milestone May 3, 2023
@valexande valexande added the type: missing feature something expected but missing from a release label May 9, 2023
@costezki costezki modified the milestones: 2023-05, 2023-planning May 17, 2023
@valexande
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related to #408

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@csnyulas csnyulas

@valexande valexande

Labels
type: missing feature something expected but missing from a release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2023-05-future
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@csnyulas @costezki @valexande