Conceptual model to show Procedure hasLegalBasis

[muricna]

The conceptual model shows hasLegalBasis with no path though Procedure although the output shows this

[csnyulas]

This information has been added at some point as the very first row of the conceptual mapping, with the Field Id called "MetaData", to each form (except for F13, by omission, which has been fixed in v.6.1.2 of the CM, which will be delivered in TX1.4). See screenshot below:

We mark this issue as Fixed. If this solution is satisfactory please close the ticket. Otherwise we will close it ourselves if there will be no additional feedback within a few days.

[csnyulas]

Here is a related question to this issue:
Currently the value for the epo:hasLegalBasis property comes from the value of the VALUE attribute of the LEGAL_BASIS XML element (as can be seen in the screenshot provided in the previous comment). In recent XSD versions, there is also a LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER XML element available for most (and perhaps all) forms.
Is there anything to be done to map the value of the LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER XML element? Should it be mapped as well? If yes, to what EPO property?

[csnyulas]

Second question:
Should the hasLegalBasis property be attached to the Procedure instance(s) (as it is now), or to the Notice instance?

[csnyulas]

Decision after discussing the issue with @muricna and @costezki:
epo:hasLegalBasis property takes as a value an IRI from the at-voc:legal-basis vocabulary, based on the value of the LEGAL_BASIS XML element. The values in LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER are of type free text (not controlled in any way), therefore they cannot be mapped to epo:hasLegalBasis property. EPO needs to be extended to allow for the representation of the values in the LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER XML elements. Also, we might want to be able to state information about the legal basis at Procedure level and at document level separately (although with containing the same value), for which we might need to add yet another property in EPO.

For now we will need to make a note in the conceptual mapping stating that the value of the LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER XML element is not going to be mapped until appropriate support for it is provided in EPO. We can do that on the "Mapping Remarks" sheet or in the Notes column of the Rules sheet .

[csnyulas]

A note about not being able to map LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER, yet, has been added to the CM, v.6.4.1 (see latest linked commit)

We can close this issue as soon as the still open question(s), i.e. the mapping of LEGAL_BASIS_OTHER, and (potentially) what is the best place to attach epo:hasLegalBasis (see #290 (comment)), have been recorded as issue(s) on the EPO project.

[csnyulas]

Closing this issue, as the two outstanding questions have been recorded as separate issues:
OP-TED/ePO#448 and #422