Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/4.1.0 rc.3 #658

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

Feature/4.1.0 rc.3 #658

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

  • fixed github issues with aux: 4.1.0-rc.2 label
  • no manual modifications on OWL/SHACL output were done

@cristianvasquez
Copy link
Contributor

Question: does The Enterprise Architect file itself specify the version? (In this case:
4.1.0 rc.3)

Copy link
Contributor

@cristianvasquez cristianvasquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Enterprise Architect

I can see the Enterprise Architect file contains the following fixes:

#638
#628
#637
#607
#627
#598
#596

https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/625

SHACL

There was no change regarding the missing SHACL properties. list

The following cannot be closed:

#614

https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/613

Owl

Redefines several elements from the external vocabularies of Cellar. list. This means we cannot publish this to be dereferenced.

The following cannot be closed

https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/538

@cristianvasquez cristianvasquez merged commit 1c245b5 into develop Jul 18, 2024
@cristianvasquez cristianvasquez deleted the feature/4.1.0-rc.3 branch July 18, 2024 13:08
@cristianvasquez cristianvasquez restored the feature/4.1.0-rc.3 branch July 18, 2024 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants