You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
i was examining one of the donut graphs for observation period and i realized that the portion showed in the slice didn't match up with the proportion.
the reason, best i can tell, is that 1) there's whitespace between slices, and 2) there's a minimum slice width required. when you combine those two 'features', we had a donut where a 90% category only took up 75% of the graph!
we likely need to figure out a different visualization to include in the OHDSI visualizsatoin library for representing categorical variables, one which doesn't distort the data in this way. posting this issue on ACHILLES since that's where i found the issue, but really this will need to be an issue addressed as the vizualization library is built out as part of the shared component library in ATLAS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i was examining one of the donut graphs for observation period and i realized that the portion showed in the slice didn't match up with the proportion.
the reason, best i can tell, is that 1) there's whitespace between slices, and 2) there's a minimum slice width required. when you combine those two 'features', we had a donut where a 90% category only took up 75% of the graph!
we likely need to figure out a different visualization to include in the OHDSI visualizsatoin library for representing categorical variables, one which doesn't distort the data in this way. posting this issue on ACHILLES since that's where i found the issue, but really this will need to be an issue addressed as the vizualization library is built out as part of the shared component library in ATLAS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: