Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quality check based on workcenter at cycle count #1292

Open
StuartJMackintosh opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Quality check based on workcenter at cycle count #1292

StuartJMackintosh opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@StuartJMackintosh
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem?

A quality check on a work center based on cycles performed is required to monitor metal detector functionality.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Work center configurable to trigger a pre-selected quality inspection at start, at N cycles and at end. These are optionally blocking or non-blocking.

A metal detector requires a positive detection forced, by placing a detectable object on to a product at work center start and after N products have passed through. At start, and at N cycles, the operator is notified that they must perform the quality check.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Using existing quality triggers based on product, lot or pick do not provide the required functionality. Otherwise, manually creating an inspection for each time the work center is in use and manually recording the detector tests.

Additional context

There are other scenarios where the work center requires verification that quality detectors are working, and each verification requires to be recorded for audit purposes.

@yostashiro
Copy link
Member

@StuartJMackintosh We are proposing an enhancement on quality_control_oca in #1278 in which we add timing field in the qc.trigger.line model. Just thought you could add more options to this field to handle your need if you create a module that works with work orders.

@StuartJMackintosh
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @yostashiro - do you feel that the OCA module could be extended with this or should it be an additional module?

@yostashiro
Copy link
Member

@StuartJMackintosh I think it could be an enhancement on quality_control_mrp_oca, or it could also be a separate module (quality_control_mrp_workorder_oca?).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants