Remove run ROBOT mesure on full ontology #135
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
util/lib.py (1)
367-392: Enhanced code structure and error handling.The function body has been restructured with improved comments explaining each step of the process. The error handling has been modified to log an error message instead of raising an exception, which is generally a good practice for better error reporting and debugging.
However, consider adding more detailed error information to the log message:
- logging.error("Preparing %s for dashboard failed...", o_path) + logging.error("Preparing %s for dashboard failed: %s", o_path, str(e))This change will provide more context about the specific error that occurred.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
util/lib.py (2)
345-356: Improved function signature and documentation.The function signature has been updated with better formatting, and a docstring has been added. These changes enhance readability and provide a brief description of the function's purpose.
364-365: Improved handling of default parameter value.The
robot_prefixesparameter is now initialized to an empty dictionary if it'sNone. This change provides a more flexible way to handle default values and follows the principle of usingNoneas a sentinel value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
util/lib.py
345-345: Missing return type annotation for public function
robot_prepare_ontologyAdd return type annotation:
None(ANN201)
346-346: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_path(ANN001)
347-347: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_out_path(ANN001)
348-348: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_metrics_path(ANN001)
349-349: Missing type annotation for function argument
base_iris(ANN001)
350-350: Missing type annotation for function argument
make_base(ANN001)
351-351: Missing type annotation for function argument
robot_prefixes(ANN001)
352-352: Missing type annotation for function argument
robot_opts(ANN001)
352-352: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
373-373: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
381-381: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
389-389:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
390-390: Do not catch blind exception:
Exception(BLE001)
391-391: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
util/lib.py (1)
345-392: Overall assessment of changes torobot_prepare_ontologyThe changes to the
robot_prepare_ontologyfunction are generally positive:
- The function signature update avoids mutable default arguments.
- The restructured function body improves readability.
- The addition of a conditional check for
robot_prefixesis necessary and well-implemented.- Improved logging statements provide better context for debugging.
To further enhance the function, consider:
- Adding type annotations and improving the docstring as suggested earlier.
- Implementing the minor improvement to error handling.
- Adding trailing commas where indicated.
These changes will result in more maintainable and robust code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
345-345: Missing return type annotation for public function
robot_prepare_ontologyAdd return type annotation:
None(ANN201)
346-346: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_path(ANN001)
347-347: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_out_path(ANN001)
348-348: Missing type annotation for function argument
o_metrics_path(ANN001)
349-349: Missing type annotation for function argument
base_iris(ANN001)
350-350: Missing type annotation for function argument
make_base(ANN001)
351-351: Missing type annotation for function argument
robot_prefixes(ANN001)
352-352: Missing type annotation for function argument
robot_opts(ANN001)
352-352: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
373-373: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
381-381: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
389-389:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
390-390: Do not catch blind exception:
Exception(BLE001)
391-391: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
|
@matentzn please have a look at the coderabbitai review and approval :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
util/lib.py
351-351: Boolean-typed positional argument in function definition
(FBT001)
353-353: Missing type annotation for function argument
robot_opts(ANN001)
389-389: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
389-389: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
397-397: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
397-397: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
405-405:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
407-407: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
util/lib.py (1)
407-407: Uselogging.exceptionfor better error loggingUsing
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorwhen handling exceptions includes the stack trace in the log output, which aids in debugging.A previous review comment suggested this improvement, and it remains applicable. Please consider updating the error handling as follows:
try: check_call(callstring) except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: - logging.error("Preparing %s for dashboard failed: %s", o_path, str(e)) + logging.exception("Preparing %s for dashboard failed.", o_path) raiseThis change:
- Uses
logging.exceptionto include the stack trace.- Removes the redundant
str(e)sincelogging.exceptioncaptures the exception details.- Re-raises the exception for proper error propagation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
407-407: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
util/lib.py
351-351: Boolean-typed positional argument in function definition
(FBT001)
389-389: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
389-389: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
397-397: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
397-397: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
405-405:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
407-407: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
util/lib.py (1)
346-373: Functionrobot_prepare_ontologyimprovements look goodThe updated function signature with type annotations and the addition of a comprehensive docstring enhance the readability and maintainability of the code. The handling of default parameters and the initialization of
robot_prefixesare implemented correctly.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
351-351: Boolean-typed positional argument in function definition
(FBT001)
The boolean positional argument make_base can lead to unclear function calls, as it's not immediately apparent what the boolean value represents.
…BO-Dashboard into anitacaron/issue131
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
util/lib.py
390-390: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
390-390: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
398-398: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
398-398: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
406-406:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
408-408: Use
logging.exceptioninstead oflogging.errorReplace with
exception(TRY400)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
util/lib.py (4)
11-11: Importing typing annotations enhances clarityIncluding
from typing import Dict, List, Optionalis a good practice for adding type hints, which improves code readability and maintainability.
346-355: Function signature enhancements approvedAdding type annotations and making
make_basea keyword-only argument improves code clarity and helps prevent bugs by enforcing explicit argument usage.
356-373: Docstring addition improves documentationThe comprehensive docstring provides clear information about the function's purpose, parameters, and return value, enhancing maintainability and aiding future developers.
353-354: Avoid mutable default arguments forrobot_prefixesSetting
robot_prefixestoNoneby default and initializing it within the function avoids potential issues with mutable default arguments, which can lead to unexpected behavior.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- util/lib.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
util/lib.py
390-390: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
390-390: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
398-398: Trailing comma prohibited
Remove trailing comma
(COM819)
398-398: Trailing comma missing
Add trailing comma
(COM812)
406-406:
subprocesscall: check for execution of untrusted input(S603)
408-408: Redundant exception object included in
logging.exceptioncall(TRY401)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
util/lib.py (3)
346-355: Excellent enhancement with type annotations and keyword-only argumentsThe addition of type annotations and making
make_basea keyword-only argument improves code clarity and type safety. This change enhances readability and prevents potential issues with positional arguments.
357-373: Comprehensive docstring improves maintainabilityAdding a detailed docstring with parameter explanations and type hints greatly improves the understandability of the function. This aids future developers in using and maintaining the code.
377-378:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct handling of multiple
robot_optsAppending
robot_optsas a single string may cause issues when it contains multiple options. It's better to splitrobot_optsinto a list of arguments to ensure they are correctly parsed bysubprocess.check_call.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if robot_opts: - callstring.append(f"{robot_opts}") + callstring.extend(robot_opts.split())Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@coderabbitai, thanks for your suggestion. It looks like @anitacaron acted on your request to add google-style docstrings. My preference is for ReST-style, especially as we SHOULD always be providing type hints already, no need to duplicate information. Thoughts? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @cmungall: Thank you for letting me know your preference for ReST-style docstrings. I understand that since type hints are already provided, duplication can be avoided. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews. (_/) ✏️ Learnings added
|
Fixes #131
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
robot_prepare_ontologyfunction.Bug Fixes
Refactor