Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TA#65509 [ADD] hr_payroll_payslipp_by_department #70

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 12.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rivo2302
Copy link

@rivo2302 rivo2302 commented Sep 2, 2024

@majouda , J'ai un petit difficulté à faire un test unitaire sur le module. En surchargent la fonction get_payslip_employees_wizard (Here) .

C'est ce code qui me pose problème , par rapport au champs contract_id , qui est un champs compute store False , et il fait un search dessus. Malgré qu'il y a le paramètre search sur le champs. Il retourne toujours une réponse vide lorsqu'on on fait un search dessus. : Here

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-0.88% 41.67%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (4aebc62) 881 860 97.62%
Head commit (bfe2766) 858 (-23) 830 (-30) 96.74% (-0.88%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#70) 12 5 41.67%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant