Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prescribed aerosols and oslo_aero #167

Open
mvertens opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

prescribed aerosols and oslo_aero #167

mvertens opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@mvertens
Copy link

mvertens commented Aug 28, 2024

In build-namelist the following section of code hard-wires the variable prescribed_aerosols. Is this still needed?

   if( $chem =~ /_oslo/){
    $prescribe_aerosols = $FALSE;
    print " ==> Using Oslo aerosols: PRESCRIBED AERO = FALSE (not yet implemented) \n"
}
@mvertens mvertens changed the title @gold2718 - I have no idea. Probably should be an issue? prescribed aerosols and oslo_aero Aug 28, 2024
@mvertens mvertens added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
@mvertens mvertens added this to the NorESM2.5 milestone Aug 28, 2024
@oyvindseland
Copy link

Given that prescribed_aero now in CAM is only defined as bam, the hard-coded version should not be needed. If relevant it can be included as a "bam_oslo" at some point but given the cloud and optical parameterisation I think the parameterisation will look entirely different.
Before the hard-wiring is removed the it should be tested if the existing test covers _oslo or whether it has to be included at the same point where the aero=_mam is setting prescribed_aero = false. As far as I can see prescribed_aero = true as the default.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants