You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given that prescribed_aero now in CAM is only defined as bam, the hard-coded version should not be needed. If relevant it can be included as a "bam_oslo" at some point but given the cloud and optical parameterisation I think the parameterisation will look entirely different.
Before the hard-wiring is removed the it should be tested if the existing test covers _oslo or whether it has to be included at the same point where the aero=_mam is setting prescribed_aero = false. As far as I can see prescribed_aero = true as the default.
In build-namelist the following section of code hard-wires the variable prescribed_aerosols. Is this still needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: