You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @TomasTorsvik,
I was briefly discussing with @JorgSchwinger about the next steps to be taken towards the iHAMOCC version for NorESM2.5 (as summarized in #340). We introduced those switches for cyanobacteria N2 uptake taking place in either the MLD or the euphotic zone only to enable better technical comparability between the isopycnic and the hybrid coordinates in BLOM. @TomasTorsvik : are they still needed or is this an outdated task and the switch can be removed in favor of cyanobacteria uptake only in the euphotic zone?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, that's what we will do eventually - I was just remembering that you had once the incentive to look into the hybrid versus isopycnic coordinates which demanded to have the switch build-in. From your answer, I grasp that we can remove it now again. Thanks.
Hi @TomasTorsvik,
I was briefly discussing with @JorgSchwinger about the next steps to be taken towards the iHAMOCC version for NorESM2.5 (as summarized in #340). We introduced those switches for cyanobacteria N2 uptake taking place in either the MLD or the euphotic zone only to enable better technical comparability between the isopycnic and the hybrid coordinates in BLOM. @TomasTorsvik : are they still needed or is this an outdated task and the switch can be removed in favor of cyanobacteria uptake only in the euphotic zone?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: