Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parsing of ShapeNetSem meshes #3

Open
gchal opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Parsing of ShapeNetSem meshes #3

gchal opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@gchal
Copy link

gchal commented Dec 4, 2020

Can you give some better instructions regarding the mesh creation with manifold?
I am following your steps and leads to segmentation fail.
Is the shapenetsem file models-OBJ.zip the one needed or am I doing sth wrong?

@clemense
Copy link
Contributor

clemense commented Feb 25, 2021

Hi,

  1. What exactly leads to a segfault? Is it the manifold or simplify command? (The simplify command can lead to crashes when dealing with degenerated triangles, see e.g.: Crash when processing a post-processed shapenet file hjwdzh/Manifold#5)
  2. Does it happen with all meshes or just a subset?

@seann999
Copy link

@clemense I am dealing with problem #1. How did you deal with it?

@clemense
Copy link
Contributor

The easiest solution is to ignore those meshes. There shouldn't be many that fail.

@seann999
Copy link

Got it; with some patience, I got around 5250 successfully simplified meshes (some seemed to take a really long time, which I killed and discarded)

@thomasweng15
Copy link

@clemense I have the same error and am getting segmentation faults for objects in the ShapeNetSem obj files, which should be the same objects that are in acronym. for example, I am getting a crash for 5bbcf08fabf2d50336b41ce3eef1f5be.obj, a "DoubleBed" object. In this case do you suggest (1) removing such objects from the dataset, (2) using the non-simplified version (i.e. the version that was made watertight by the manifold command but not simplified), or (3) something else? Thank you for your help.

@thomasweng15
Copy link

It seems that (1) would require regenerating scene_contacts as some scenes reference the removed meshes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants