You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I am grateful for the work you and your team have done on the parameterization of turbomachinery blades, which has been helpful for my current research. I have a few questions to ask:
1.According to the description in your paper, the (u, v) matching and DVS optimization should alternate during the blade parameterization process. However, when running the example, why does it only perform one iteration? Where in the .cfg file should the complete number of iteration cycles be set?
2.Why does the initial plot appear discontinuous during the first iteration?
3.In the 3D matching parameterization process of the NASA_67 blade, why are the numbers of x_leading and y_leading different?
I look forward to your response and would be very grateful.
Sincerely,
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello, I am grateful for the work you and your team have done on the parameterization of turbomachinery blades, which has been helpful for my current research. I have a few questions to ask:
1.According to the description in your paper, the (u, v) matching and DVS optimization should alternate during the blade parameterization process. However, when running the example, why does it only perform one iteration? Where in the .cfg file should the complete number of iteration cycles be set?
2.Why does the initial plot appear discontinuous during the first iteration?
3.In the 3D matching parameterization process of the NASA_67 blade, why are the numbers of x_leading and y_leading different?
I look forward to your response and would be very grateful.
Sincerely,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions