-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chrome no headless option #18
Comments
Non-headless is not supported by Docker. |
um, i thought something was playable with xvfb okok 🤔 |
ok, I'm taking my words back. Yes, it's possible to use xvfb for that. |
Can you add it to the base Image? |
HeadfullHey ! Sadly not for the moment, I'm stuck on this :
Everything start but chrome api couldn't be called 🤔 I've stoped my research on this last answer : Maybe i'm missing something 🤷♂️ If you want to test i probably have my test branch somewhere based on https://github.com/siomiz/chrome , ping me on discord HeadlessFor these reasons I began to study concealing a headless chrome based on https://github.com/paulirish/headless-cat-n-mouse, with an MITM docker before page explorer interpretation. This allow us JS injection to bypass client side headless detection. The cat n mouse race to hide headless is not ended, but we should share it. I've added you to my private repo example, we could integrate it as an option in worker or side by side (DockerCompose) or in ferret (like a cdp option). Actually my example success on this test : https://intoli.com/blog/not-possible-to-block-chrome-headless/chrome-headless-test.html (I've added an fql example on discord to test chrome based on intoli test) |
Take a look at: https://github.com/jvitor83/chrome-debug-node-vnc It is a built-in chrome with debug capabilities and VNC for remote viewer and node to use puppeteer. In some testing it isn't detected as a bot because it is headfull (but inside docker container). |
@PierreBrisorgueil hey, have you managed to create a Docker image with non-headless Chromium? |
@ziflex have you deep dive the subject ? |
works, thx |
it might be nice to have the possibility for the build to choose a non-headless for some usecases
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: