Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we make a docker image of qha? #54

Open
singularitti opened this issue Jul 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Should we make a docker image of qha? #54

singularitti opened this issue Jul 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
docker docker image maintainment

Comments

@singularitti
Copy link
Member

singularitti commented Jul 22, 2018 •
edited
Loading

As mentioned in #52,

Some of the components, such as the plotter or the converter, should be a part of QHA, doesn't have to depend on QHA. Depending on QHA limits their use cases since QHA is not available to be installed everywhere (such as on Habanero or other places where bigfloat could not be installed or Python is not of version 3.6).

Will it be easier for people who use qha on supercomputers because they are the target users of qha?
@singularitti singularitti added the docker docker image maintainment label Jul 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docker docker image maintainment
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@singularitti