Replies: 2 comments
-
The basics of a virtual interface as a data type are supported; see the "Virtual interface data type" unit test for examples. The error you posted looks like a simple parser bug, probably confused by the protected keyword prior to it. I don't remember exactly what I knew was missing; I'd have to go back through that section of the LRM and check each feature and restriction and make sure they're all implemented. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
No worries on details. I just didn't want to start submitting issues for things already known to not be implemented. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I see that virtual interfaces are listed as only partially supported. Can you describe what is currently supported?
For reference, here's the errors given when declaring a virtual interface within a class:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions