Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review data provider arguments. #88

Open
emanlove opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Review data provider arguments. #88

emanlove opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@emanlove
Copy link
Member

emanlove commented Apr 1, 2024

There are a few keywords which from the docs display arguments as *args, **kwargs +. Beside being unclear on what these arguments are, I am not sure the current implementation can properly translate data types (if any are required). So we should review arguments of the data providers and see if we can better support passing arguments from robot to faker on data providers.

+ Footnote: The fact that arguments are unnamed or generic itself might only be solved within Faker. There is some options to correct that within the FakerLibrary side. But the maintenance and change cost may be too high for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant