You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper uncovers that the judgement consistency of LLM dramatically decreases when confronted with disruptions like questioning, negation, or misleading, even though its previous judgments were correct. It also explores several prompting methods to mitigate this issue and demonstrates their effectiveness.
Thank you for your consideration! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I have read your insightful paper and found it to be a valuable contribution to the field.
I would like to kindly suggest adding our recent work to your survey.
📄 Paper: Ask Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgement
This paper uncovers that the judgement consistency of LLM dramatically decreases when confronted with disruptions like questioning, negation, or misleading, even though its previous judgments were correct. It also explores several prompting methods to mitigate this issue and demonstrates their effectiveness.
Thank you for your consideration! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: