You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For instance, let's say w = 1 for virus and w = 150 for bacteria. However, sometimes the weights for virus and bacteria are inverted by Icarust. I see it because I selectively filter out all DNA different from the COVID19 DNA with Readfish; sometimes, almost no reads are filtered. I check after the run, and indeed find that Icarust only generated 1/151 bacterial reads and 150/151 viral reads.
If I restart the simulation without changing anything, everything works fine! So it is not that big a deal (I have to monitor the start of each simulation, and restart if necessary). But it is a bit worrying and definitely an unexpected behavior. It happens randomly, and I witnessed the issue in different simulation environment (different lab clusters).
Do you have any clues why that is? Does chance intervene at some point in the choice of the weights?
I hope you are doing well and thank you for your help.
Sincerely
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hey @SimiliSerpent, sorry for the slow reply, I've just been on holiday for two weeks!
This shouldn't be happening, no doubt. It definitely seems like they're being switched in the code, i assume they are hardcoded in the actual TOML file?
No worries, I was busy watching the olympics and paralympics! Well, it is my turn to say sorry for the delay.
Yes, the simulated genomes are hardcoded in the TOML file. I will look deeper in the source code if I have a chance, and repost here if I find anything. If any other Icarust user encounters the same issue, please let me know!
Hi Rory,
I am simulating SARS-CoV-2 diluted in a bacterial environment. My configuration file looks as follows :
For instance, let's say
w = 1
for virus andw = 150
for bacteria. However, sometimes the weights for virus and bacteria are inverted by Icarust. I see it because I selectively filter out all DNA different from the COVID19 DNA with Readfish; sometimes, almost no reads are filtered. I check after the run, and indeed find that Icarust only generated 1/151 bacterial reads and 150/151 viral reads.If I restart the simulation without changing anything, everything works fine! So it is not that big a deal (I have to monitor the start of each simulation, and restart if necessary). But it is a bit worrying and definitely an unexpected behavior. It happens randomly, and I witnessed the issue in different simulation environment (different lab clusters).
Do you have any clues why that is? Does chance intervene at some point in the choice of the weights?
I hope you are doing well and thank you for your help.
Sincerely
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: