We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On Friday @nareshkamboju noted an error in IRC in relation to the packetdrill test.
packetdrill
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2472563#L1370
Note: make: bison: Command not found
make: bison: Command not found
I scrolled up a bit and saw another interesting problem:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2472563#L1324
Note: Unsupported distro: lkft! Package installation skipped!
Unsupported distro: lkft! Package installation skipped!
Why would the distro be lkft?
lkft
Everything looked OK in the actual test:
test-definitions/automated/linux/packetdrill/packetdrill.sh
Line 84 in 38e5112
So how is dist_name getting lkft for the dist and should we do special installs for that in the test?
dist_name
dist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our OE distro is named lkft.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@mrchapp Does that mean the OE build is missing a package or that the packetdrill test should install the deps for lkft?
No branches or pull requests
On Friday @nareshkamboju noted an error in IRC in relation to the
packetdrill
test.https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2472563#L1370
Note:
make: bison: Command not found
I scrolled up a bit and saw another interesting problem:
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2472563#L1324
Note:
Unsupported distro: lkft! Package installation skipped!
Why would the distro be
lkft
?Everything looked OK in the actual test:
test-definitions/automated/linux/packetdrill/packetdrill.sh
Line 84 in 38e5112
So how is
dist_name
gettinglkft
for thedist
and should we do special installs for that in the test?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: