Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue: implicit and explicit snapshots #118

Open
5 of 11 tasks
vweevers opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
5 of 11 tasks

Tracking issue: implicit and explicit snapshots #118

vweevers opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@vweevers
Copy link
Member

vweevers commented Sep 26, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Implicit snapshots

Main task here is to fix the issue described in Level/leveldown#796.

Explicit snapshots

This is a new feature, explained by the first PR below. Prior discussions: #45, #47, Level/leveldown#486.
@vweevers vweevers added this to Level Sep 26, 2022
@vweevers vweevers moved this to Backlog in Level Sep 26, 2022
This was referenced Sep 26, 2022
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2022
Closed
15 tasks
vweevers added a commit to Level/abstract-level that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2022
@vweevers
Breaking: require snapshots to be created synchronously
d2e9ef4 
Ref Level/community#118.
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2022
Merged
vweevers added a commit to Level/abstract-level that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2022
@vweevers
Breaking: require snapshots to be created synchronously (#54)
03da0fe 
Ref Level/community#118.
vweevers added a commit to Level/classic-level that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2022
@vweevers
Create snapshot for get() synchronously
b95f5a9 
Has a tiny performance cost, which I negated by optimizing the
passing of options from JS to C++. The end result is faster than
before. However, I didn't check if it blocks the event loop for
a significant amount of time. Benchmarking concurrent gets might
answer that, later.

Ref Level/community#118.
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Nov 19, 2022
Merged
12 tasks
vweevers added a commit to Level/abstract-level that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2024
@vweevers
Breaking: require snapshots to be created synchronously (#54)
d89e68e 
Ref Level/community#118.
vweevers added a commit to Level/classic-level that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2024
@vweevers
Create snapshot for get() synchronously
b4404b3 
Has a tiny performance cost, which I negated by optimizing the
passing of options from JS to C++. The end result is faster than
before. However, I didn't check if it blocks the event loop for
a significant amount of time. Benchmarking concurrent gets might
answer that, later.

Ref Level/community#118.
vweevers added a commit to Level/classic-level that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2024
@vweevers
Create snapshot for get() synchronously
fbcdb7b 
Has a tiny performance cost, which I negated by optimizing the
passing of options from JS to C++. The end result is faster than
before. However, I didn't check if it blocks the event loop for
a significant amount of time. Benchmarking concurrent gets might
answer that, later.

Ref: Level/community#118
Category: fix
vweevers added a commit to Level/classic-level that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2024
@vweevers
Create snapshot for get() synchronously
50e03dc 
Has a tiny performance cost, which I negated by optimizing the
passing of options from JS to C++. The end result is faster than
before. However, I didn't check if it blocks the event loop for
a significant amount of time. Benchmarking concurrent gets might
answer that, later.

Ref: Level/community#118
Category: fix
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2024
Closed
vweevers added a commit to Level/supports that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
@vweevers
Add implicit- and explicitSnapshots
68bac51 
Ref: Level/community#118
Category: addition
vweevers added a commit to Level/supports that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
@vweevers
Add implicit- and explicitSnapshots
e4b5378 
Ref: Level/community#118
Category: addition
vweevers added a commit to Level/abstract-level that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2024
@vweevers
Implement explicit snapshots
2b99040 
See Level/community#118. Depends on
Level/supports#32.

Category: addition
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Dec 22, 2024
Open
vweevers added a commit to Level/memory-level that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2024
@vweevers
Implement explicit snapshots
2bb79fa 
See Level/community#118. Depends on
Level/abstract-level#93.

Category: addition
@vweevers vweevers mentioned this issue Dec 22, 2024
Draft
@vweevers vweevers moved this from Backlog to In Progress in Level Dec 22, 2024
vweevers added a commit to Level/supports that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2024
@vweevers
Add implicit- and explicitSnapshots
61f15ae 
Ref: Level/community#118
Category: addition
vweevers added a commit to Level/abstract-level that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2024
@vweevers
Implement explicit snapshots
7dca766 
See Level/community#118. Depends on
Level/supports#32.

Category: addition
vweevers added a commit to Level/memory-level that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2024
@vweevers
Implement explicit snapshots
22e9e64 
See Level/community#118. Depends on
Level/abstract-level#93.

Category: addition
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
Level
Status: In Progress
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@vweevers