You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do you think it would be difficult to adapt mopidy-party for the following us case ?
Alice, Bob and Carol want to listen to music together and agree to choose the music played one song at a time in rotation. They each choose their songs, either on separate devices (eg. phones that have access to the web interface), or by passing the device to each other in rotation. A kind of slot based approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey, thanks for your interest!
We already rely on the remote_ip to transparently discriminate between users for skip votes. It might be quite easy to change the queuing policy to a round-robin based on the user (if mopidy supports that kind of reordering).
But I suspect that we might need more advanced backend than what is currently available, to remember users and their contributions in the current mopidy queue.
Do you think it would be difficult to adapt mopidy-party for the following us case ?
Alice, Bob and Carol want to listen to music together and agree to choose the music played one song at a time in rotation. They each choose their songs, either on separate devices (eg. phones that have access to the web interface), or by passing the device to each other in rotation. A kind of slot based approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: