You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently deletes are handled in the delete call. It would be better if the files to remove are just moved to a separate collection, so that a worker thread can take care of this in the background. This would decrease the time it takes for delete calls to just move the files in the meta db. This would also be a big improvement for bucket deletes, as we can simply rename the bucket and reclaim it later. Right now, creating a bucket with the same name as a recently deleted bucket will fail until the bucket is completely deleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently deletes are handled in the delete call. It would be better if the files to remove are just moved to a separate collection, so that a worker thread can take care of this in the background. This would decrease the time it takes for delete calls to just move the files in the meta db. This would also be a big improvement for bucket deletes, as we can simply rename the bucket and reclaim it later. Right now, creating a bucket with the same name as a recently deleted bucket will fail until the bucket is completely deleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: