Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scenario LCA: clearer feedback on exchange imports #542

Closed
bsteubing opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Scenario LCA: clearer feedback on exchange imports #542

bsteubing opened this issue Feb 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature Issues/PRs related to a new feature

Comments

@bsteubing
Copy link
Member

The way we import scenario difference files is problematic at this moment for the following reasons:

  • exchanges that are specified in the scenario difference file, but are not found in the LCI database ARE NOT REPORTED, but silently ignored... this makes the SDFs work, but fails to notify users about not using the data as specified. I could have a file with 100000 exchanges and as long as only one can be identified (and the other 99.99% not) it looks to the user as if all goes well - this is not good...
  • we need to inform users if exchanges could not be found (as a warning, still enabling calculations)
  • one idea could be to give the option to the user to save a copy of the SDF where the rows (or better cells) are marked in red where exchanges were not identified correctly (or something similar, so he can understand what needs to be done)
@bsteubing bsteubing added the feature Issues/PRs related to a new feature label Feb 26, 2021
@Zoophobus Zoophobus mentioned this issue Aug 30, 2023
3 tasks
@marc-vdm
Copy link
Member

Closing this as resolved in #1025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Issues/PRs related to a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants