From 638d90ef2bc3f46d585536f1405e60db4e2a6b82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omer Yacine <mariocynicys@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:36:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add a missing fixme

always rename discuss markers to fixmes since i forget about them xD
---
 mm2src/coins/utxo/utxo_common.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm2src/coins/utxo/utxo_common.rs b/mm2src/coins/utxo/utxo_common.rs
index 54193ba7f2..c095cf446d 100644
--- a/mm2src/coins/utxo/utxo_common.rs
+++ b/mm2src/coins/utxo/utxo_common.rs
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ pub mod tx_sizes {
         // to prevent certain utxos from being spent in other swaps happening in parallel.
         // We just need to make sure that we deliver the correct trading volume and not less.
 
-        // Inspect `get_sender_trade_fee`, but I don't think it nails it correctly.
+        // FIXME: Inspect `get_sender_trade_fee`, but I don't think it nails it correctly.
         todo!()
     }
 
@@ -4030,7 +4030,7 @@ pub fn get_trade_fee<T: UtxoCommonOps>(coin: T) -> Box<dyn Future<Item = TradeFe
     Box::new(fut.boxed().compat())
 }
 
-// DISCUSS: Why do we inforce such a constraint? And it's now always true if we change the utxo picking algo.
+// FIXME: Why do we inforce such a constraint? And it's now always true if we change the utxo picking algo.
 // E.g. an algo that favors getting rid of small utxos (basically, consolidates whenever possible) might pick
 // more inputs for a smaller amount and one large input for a larger amount, thus fee for the larger amount is less.
 /// To ensure the `get_sender_trade_fee(x) <= get_sender_trade_fee(y)` condition is satisfied for any `x < y`,